The final paragraph summarizes the entire book. And if there's one paragraph you want to memorize, this is it. And it reads like this, "If getting rich is the result of doing things in a certain way, and if like causes always produce like effects, then any man or woman who can do things in that way can become rich. And the whole matter is brought within the domain of exact science."

Let me break this down for you. Firstly, there's the assumption that this certain way is proven. It is not something that is new. It's proven by those who had gotten rich doing these things. So this first sentence has a hypothesis. And you can add the word it is indeed proven that getting rich is the result of doing things in a certain way. It doesn't change the intent and the meaning of this statement.

In the Science of Getting Rich doctrine, the certain way refers to something or some method that is already proven, that has already produced the results where people who followed this method, already have gotten rich.

That is the first assumption. Now, if you reflect back on many of the things you attempted. The question I have for you is "Did you at any part in your life discover a certain way or follow a certain way but follow it to the T? Why?" Because it says "If like causes always produce like effect". We're talking about cause and effect. And he's bringing in science by the way. This is a science of getting rich. This is not the art of getting rich. We're not talking about creativity necessarily in that concept. He talks about creativity in the mind, but when it comes to doing things in a certain way, we're not asking you to be creative. We're asking you to follow proven wealth principles.

Then he says, "Then any man or woman". He didn't say only a rich man or only a clever man or an educated man or a man brought up in the right environment. None of these are assumptions. He says "any men or woman".

What requirement? There's only one requirement: "Who can do things in that way can become rich, and the whole method is brought within the domain of exact science."

To put it very simplistically, if there's evidence of people becoming rich, following this methodology, and if you follow this methodology in the same way that those who came before followed and became rich, Wallace D Walters is guaranteeing you equal and similar success. Because he says "any man or woman who can do things in that way can become rich."

And he explains it and says this is really science. There's nothing to be so surprised about because it's about doing the same things in a certain way.